Hillary Flip-Flops at debate

September 27, 2007

The New York Daily News has the details:

“It cannot be American policy, period,” Clinton (D-N.Y.) told debate moderator Tim Russert, who asked if there should be a presidential exemption to allow the torture of a terror chieftain if authorities knew a bomb was about to go off, but didn’t know where it was.

[. . .]

Last October, Clinton told the Daily News: “If we’re going to be preparing for the kind of improbable but possible eventuality, then it has to be done within the rule of law.”

She said then the “ticking time bomb” scenario represents a narrow exception to her opposition to torture as morally wrong, ineffective and dangerous to American soldiers.

“In the event we were ever confronted with having to interrogate a detainee with knowledge of an imminent threat to millions of Americans, then the decision to depart from standard international practices must be made by the President, and the President must be held accountable,” she said.

Typical Clinton, say what you think the audience wants to hear and reconcile it with your past statements later.

UPDATE: More from Ben Smith at the Politico

One Response to “Hillary Flip-Flops at debate”

  1. Thomas Nikl Says:

    Flip Flopping isn’t a bad thing. Flip Flopping translates is what intelligent people do after they have perhaps reconsidered facts, new facts, or had meaningful discussions with others. Flip Flopping is being able to put pride aside, admit you may have been wrong in the past, and make a new, better decision.

    Flip Flopping isn’t always a bad thing, being a stubborn moron and never changing anything (ahem BUSH et al.) is a bad thing.


Leave a Reply